Textiles breaks generic inventory software in two specific ways: stock is tracked by lot because two lots of the same quality are not interchangeable, and half the value-add happens at somebody else’s premises. A system that handles neither will not survive a season.
| Processor | Lot | Sent | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sri Venkat Dyeing | GR-4412 | 1,840 m | 1,840 m |
| Anand Processors | GR-4408 | 2,600 m | 420 m |
| Kumar Printing | GR-4415 | 960 m | 960 m |
Grey lots, dyed lots and finished lots tracked separately, because a shade difference between two lots of the same quality is the difference between a sale and a return.
Fabric sent to a dyer or a processor stays on your books at their premises, and what comes back is matched against what went — with shrinkage accounted for rather than absorbed.
One style, many SKUs, without typing a separate item master for each combination.
Grey cost plus processing plus wastage gives a finished-metre cost that is a fact rather than a rule of thumb.
Bought in kilograms, processed in metres, sold in pieces — with conversions held against the item rather than done on a calculator.
Textile terms are long and the ageing matters. Limits per party, enforced when the order is taken.
Yes. It goes out on a job work challan, stays on your books as your stock at their premises, and what comes back is reconciled against what went — including shrinkage, which is recorded as a cost rather than quietly lost.
Yes, as variants of one style rather than as separate item masters, so a forty-SKU range is one item with its combinations instead of forty things to maintain.
Yes. Unit conversions are held against the item, so purchase, processing and sale can each use the unit that trade actually uses.
Mechanically it is the same feature; the reason differs. Pharma tracks batches for expiry and recall, textiles tracks lots because shade and quality vary between them and customers notice. Both are recorded on the invoice line.
Start free and see what is sitting at your processors, lot by lot.